What measures ensure candidates' integrity during RASP 2 assessments?

The choice that reflects the most effective measures for ensuring candidates' integrity during RASP 2 assessments is the implementation of strict guidelines and supervision. This approach establishes a controlled environment where assessors can maintain high standards of integrity throughout the evaluation process. By having clear protocols, it minimizes the risk of bias and encourages consistent adherence to predetermined evaluation criteria.

Supervision also plays a crucial role in monitoring candidates during assessments, helping to deter any potential misconduct or unethical behavior. Assessors who are actively supervising can intervene when necessary to uphold the assessment's integrity, ensuring that all candidates are being evaluated based on the same standards and procedures. This contributes to fair and reliable outcomes, thereby enhancing the credibility of the assessment process.

Open-ended evaluation criteria and sharing personal experiences can introduce subjectivity and variability, which may undermine the consistency and objectivity needed in evaluations. Frequent changes in assessors, while potentially bringing diverse perspectives, could also lead to inconsistencies in evaluation standards, which might compromise the assessment's integrity.