How should recommendations be presented in an AAR format?

Recommendations in an After Action Review (AAR) format should be presented in an issue, discussion, recommendation format. This approach allows for a structured and comprehensive analysis of the events being reviewed. The issue component identifies the problem or situation that arose during the operation. Following this, the discussion aspect provides context, detailing what happened, why it happened, and any relevant observations or insights derived from the experience. Finally, the recommendation part suggests specific, actionable steps to address the identified issues based on the insights from the discussion.

This format enhances clarity and ensures that the recommendations are grounded in a thorough understanding of the events leading up to them. It encourages critical thinking and reflection, allowing participants to engage with the material on a deeper level and facilitating effective learning so future operations can improve accordingly.

Utilizing merely bullet points, a chronological story format, or just a summary of actions fails to provide the necessary depth or critical analysis required for effective recommendations. Without the discussion element, the context behind the issues may be overlooked, ultimately compromising the potential for meaningful improvements.