How are candidate evaluations documented in the RASP 2 Board?

Candidate evaluations in the RASP 2 Board are documented through comprehensive scoring sheets and performance reviews. This method ensures a standardized approach to evaluating candidates, allowing for detailed assessments of their abilities and behaviors during the evaluation process. Scoring sheets provide specific criteria against which candidates are measured, enabling evaluators to quantify their performance methodically.

Additionally, performance reviews encapsulate qualitative feedback that helps provide context to the scores and can highlight observations made during the assessment. This thorough documentation is crucial for maintaining consistency, transparency, and fairness in the evaluation process, which contributes to the integrity of the selection program.

The other methods mentioned would not provide the same level of structure and reliability. For instance, verbal interviews may lack the detailed and consistent documentation needed for proper evaluations, while informal notes might result in subjective and potentially unverified assessments. Video recordings, while useful in some contexts, are not typically utilized for formal evaluations within this program and may not capture the overall evaluative criteria as effectively as written scoring sheets and reviews do.